In his influential 1991 essay, “The Romantic Criticism of Romantic Criticism,” Patrick Parrinder delves into the complexities of Romantic literary theory, offering readers a deep dive into the way Romantic critics have engaged with their own era’s literary works. This essay, which you can read in the eNotes Romantic Literary Criticism section, is a critical examination of how Romanticism has shaped literature and reflected upon itself. In this blog post, we will explore the key themes of Parrinder’s analysis and discuss why understanding these themes is crucial for appreciating the Romantic era’s impact on literary criticism. But first, go read the essay, then come back, and let’s discuss!
1. The Nature of Romantic Self-Reflection
One of the central themes Parrinder addresses is the inherent self-reflection within Romantic criticism. As Parrinder points out, Romantic critics were not merely evaluating literature; they were engaging in a form of self-examination, questioning their ideals and the nature of their literary practices. This introspective quality is significant because it reveals how the Romantic movement was not only a literary phenomenon but also a period of intense self-scrutiny and philosophical inquiry.
2. The Role of the Individual in Romantic Criticism
Parrinder also explores the emphasis Romantic criticism places on individual experience and perception. Romantic critics often championed the subjective and personal aspects of literature, valuing individual emotional responses and the unique perspectives of writers. This focus on individuality reflects broader Romantic values, such as the celebration of personal intuition and the belief in the transformative power of the individual imagination.
3. The Influence of Romanticism on Literary Theory
The essay highlights how Romantic criticism has had a lasting impact on literary theory. Romantic critics laid the groundwork for modern discussions about the role of the critic, the nature of literary value, and the relationship between author and text. Parrinder’s examination shows that Romanticism’s self-referential critique helped shape subsequent literary movements and theories, influencing how later critics and theorists approached literature.
4. The Tension Between Idealism and Practical Criticism
Another important theme in Parrinder’s essay is the tension between the idealistic aspirations of Romantic critics and the practical realities of literary criticism. Romantic critics often espoused lofty ideals about the role of literature and the critic’s mission, yet they also had to contend with the practicalities of critiquing a diverse and evolving body of work. This tension underscores the challenges inherent in literary criticism and the often conflicting demands placed on critics.
In Conclusion
Patrick Parrinder’s essay offers valuable insights into the nature of Romantic literary criticism and its enduring influence. By examining the self-reflective nature of Romantic criticism, the emphasis on individual experience, and the impact on literary theory, Parrinder sheds light on the complexities of how Romantic critics engaged with their own scholarly traditions. Understanding these themes not only enhances our appreciation of Romantic literature but also deepens our grasp of the evolution of literary criticism itself.
In exploring Parrinder’s essay, we gain a clearer perspective on how Romanticism has shaped its own era and the future of literary critique. The insights provided in this essay remain relevant, reminding us of the ongoing dialogue between literature and its critics.